French Marxist philosopher Guy Debord and kultuuriteoreetiku http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Debor

French Marxist philosopher Guy Debord and kultuuriteoreetiku http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Debord (1931-1994) peateose "society of the spectacle" was released first published https://www.raamatukoi.ee/cgi-bin/raamat?208361 In 1967, the island of Anti Eestin the smooth my tnt translation, nearly half a century later. The book seem almost manifesto: it consists of 221 ühiskonnakriitilisest thesis, the text is accessible, occasionally witty, rhetorically seductive, downright poetic. Work is sort of aphoristic slogans and posters created for. The author writes in the foreword: "This book must be read to remember my tnt that it is written in a conscious intent to harm the society of the spectacle" (page 10). So the work is included with strife that circulates my tnt the status my tnt quo and the thirst of change, of revolution. Debord was his almost-revolution. During my tnt the 1968 maisündmuste covered walls with quotes from the streets of Paris "performance my tnt society" - which could be considered ironic, given the antipathy expressed by Debord citations as a fragment out of context - with Debord led by artistic and political groupings Situatsionistlikku International and is considered to be one of those troublemakers The main orchestrator (although the extent of this role is disputed to this day). Given that Debord was designed to urge a revolutionary in the context of its time, one may question the possible limitation my tnt of the work. Debord himself had anticipated such planning doubt: the continuing relevance, the novelty of the work appealing to the end of its life, he refused to uustrükkides making changes and additions. "The spectacle society" is mentioned in the 20th century, the most important theoretical and 20th-century masterpiece "capital". my tnt Such estimates are perhaps somewhat exaggerated, considering that the original can be found in this book quite narrowly: in addition my tnt to Marx and Hegel relies to a large extent, Lukácsi Debord and the Frankfurt School, and the idea borrows the concept of Barthes's own society of the spectacle. ("Ideas are changing for the better. Meaning of words participates my tnt in the improvement of this. Plagiarism is necessary. Expects this progress," Debord writes in his thesis 207.), The main contribution of the work lies in their thoughts, or pouring incendiary, concentrated, and löövasse loosunglikku form. One might ask whether the early 21st century the then situation is perhaps something in common, which is the issue of the necessity of such a work would justify. Tip can be found on the Estonian publication kaanepöördel in the ratings that "in their full glory and misery is only now becoming a true spectacle of society, the new media explosion hiliskapitalistlikus included the development of cultural reality." It can be deduced that Debord's work is relevant today than ever: he describes the spectacle of society is taking an increasingly powerful line tours, while the word "hiliskapitalism" is embodied in the expectation of a hectic whisper very soon ... _______________________
"Society of the spectacle" a culmination of Isolation "But my tnt in our current time ... prefers the designation signified, a copy of the original, representation to reality and the appearance my tnt of nature ... when the truth is considered profane and the sacred is only an illusion. In fact, it is believed that the sanctity of the increasing along the way and the truth comes down to the illusion increases, so that the ultimate illusion can also be the ultimate holiness. "- Ludwig Feuerbach, Preface my tnt book The Essence of Christianity, second edition. 1 In societies dominated by modern relations of production, there is a huge life-view games accumulation. All you lived through just before, are now reduced representation is (or non-members of the front of the application or the perception of being the front). Second of all aspects of life merge into the general flow of disconnected images, which are no longer able to get back to the unity of life. Fragmented conceptions of reality are grouped into a new unity, which constitutes the separate pseudo-world, and you can only watch. The world of images-images autonomiseerunud specialization results in a world where even get tüssajaid trick. The game has a specific vision of life in reverse rotation, the autonomous movement of non-residence. my tnt From the third game presents itself simultaneously as a society, as a part of society, and the unification of the resort. Society as part of the whole vision and all consciousness of the focal point. But thanks to the fact that this sector has evolved, it's actually a sphere of delusion and false consciousness: unifitseeritus, which it achieves nothing other than the general separation of the official language. 4 From the game does not have a set of images; It is a social relationship my tnt between people that is mediated by images. 5 The spectacle can not be understood only by the mass media technologies of production my tnt of visual exaggeration. It is a worldview that has actually materialized, my tnt the vision of the world, my tnt which is objektiviseerunud. 6 Understood as a whole