That disinterest manifested sometimes in deliberate ignorance of protection policies, or in the abs

PHRASE. "TO postoffice LET WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL UCR 2015 NO signfica REEDITEMOS ALLIANCE THAT THERE IS THE DIFFERENCE IF BINNER CANDIDATE, THIS TIME TO PUT IT RUA OF U.S.." (ALICIA CICILIANI)
The Government of Santa Fe since the beginning of the socialist administration in 2007, has shown a striking lack of interest in the promotion and implementation postoffice of policies postoffice relating to the protection of consumer rights.
That disinterest manifested sometimes in deliberate ignorance of protection policies, or in the absence of any plan or policy regarding consumption generated from provincial or strongly, in an attitude of the provincial government to boycott measures established for consumers, as occurred during the price agreement implemented by the National Government in the year 2013.
As we pointed out in previous posts (here and here for example), provincial authorities declared publicly in an unusual way and not have powers to implement national marketing standards, so as to try to justify the attitude of boycott against the price agreement governing throughout the national territory.
The force in the province and rules concerning these standards, it has not undergone any change in many years, so the provincial government has always postoffice had the authority socialist officials have not declared. As we explained in previous post, Decrees 762/85 and 850/94 postoffice provides that the Directorate General of Domestic Trade is the enforcement authority of local marketing rules, including postoffice 22,802 Laws (Fair Trading), 20.680 (Supply) , 19,511 (Legal Metrology), 24,240 (Consumer Protection) and related legislation.
Unsustainable statements and conduct of officials (following clear instructions provincial executive), were a memorable public legal newsprint. And now, this attitude must be changed before the new agreement Prices postoffice Care, which like its predecessor of 2013, applies throughout the country.
Not because the provincial government postoffice had changed its apparent ideological position contrary to such agreements, postoffice but for the simple reason that under the pressure of the population postoffice interested in purchasing these items at fixed price, it was impossible for the provincial government, continue through the disengaged in the sensitive food prices and drink theme.
Public statements of provincial officials were then modified. But it's a verbal commitment to price agreement, a token adherence, without any support in the facts that remain deliberately postoffice exercise the powers to monitor compliance Care Price in Santa Fe province
It is not known-at least publicly-that the Directorate General of Domestic Trade of the province has made to date some control procedure agreed Cities postoffice Santa Fe or Rosario or in any other location. Naturally, as any procedure performed in supermarkets in the province, could not confirm if there is a failure, and having checked breaches of course did not apply any sanctions.
Possibly for this reason, the Chamber of Deputies of Santa Fe approved a draft notice through which asks the provincial executive to report the number of inspectors per cultivated area and records to date under the agreement Prices Care, as you can see here.
According maintain consumer associations and the staff of the Directorate General of Domestic Trade, on the southern delegation from the Directorate itself, based in Rosario (with over a million inhabitants), there are only two inspectors who should take over control not only the agreement, but all other powers and rules inherent in the body. The same situation as inspectors presented in the City of Santa Fe, with more than 400,000 inhabitants. A neglected area by the provincial government, which has shown a systematic disregard for the rights of consumers santafesinos.
Pretending postoffice that with two people per city, can be controlled all premises supermarket chains attached, is a clear demonstration that the provincial government has no interest in taking their obligation to protect the consumer.
In this regard, we read yesterday in The Capital John Mark Aviano, the Center for Social Studies and Community Action (Cesyac): "Aviano said national controls are super frequent but was unhappy with the track at the provincial level. On cue